Progressive Action Score: 69A score of 69 means that Rep. Case has acted to support 69% of a slate of progressive policies in the 109th Congress.
Progressive, forward-looking actions Rep. Case has taken to merit a PAS of 69:Rep. Case voted a firm "NO" against the Tyranny Act, H.R. 6166. Rep. Case swore a solemn oath of office to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States of America. Rep Case honored that oath by actively opposing H.R. 6166, which directly attacks the Constitution, and through its attack upon the Constitution attacks the freedom of every American and every person living under American jurisdiction.
Shamefully passed into law, the Tyranny Act installs undemocratic executive committees without review to designate citizens and noncitizens alike as enemy combatants without standards for proof. It grants George W. Bush amnesty for his current violations of law. It allows the thoroughly untrustworthy George W. Bush supreme authority to decide whether an interrogation technique qualifies as torture. It allows hearsay evidence to be used to convict an accused person. It permits indefinite detention without review.
All of these provisions in the bill are unconstitutional. That makes this bill unAmerican. But Representative Case acted with honor by standing up to this unAmerican bill. Had more members of Congress acted with the sense of honor displayed by Rep. Case, our liberty would not now be in such peril.
Section 102 of H.R. 418 authorizes the Secretary of Homeland Security to nullify any law she or he deems necessary to build roads and fences in the vicinity of a national border. Furthermore, Section 102 of H.R. 418 makes it legally impossible for any court or agency of the government to review the Secretary of Homeland Security's decision to nullify any law. In short, Section 102 places the Bush administration untouchably above the law.
The Farr Amendment would have stricken this language, and only this language, from H.R. 418, making a vote for the Farr Amendment a vote for the rule of law. Thank you, Representative Case, for voting "yes" on the Farr Amendment and supporting the rule of law.By voting "yes" on the Scott Amendment, Rep. Case tried to remove language in H.R. 27 that allows organizations to engage in government-funded religious discrimination in hiring. Unfortunately, the Scott Amendment failed. Still, with this vote, Rep. Case made an important stand, protecting traditional constitutional bulwarks and making it clear that at least for some Americans, discrimination is simply unacceptable.
To members of Congress, talk of patriotism comes easy. But what about action to preserve what is great about America? What about protecting the symbol of America, the bald eagle itself? On September 29, 2005, a slim majority of member of the United States House of Representatives voted for H.R. 3824, an attack upon the landmark law that brought the American bald eagle back from the brink of extinction. Without the Endangered Species Act, the American bald eagle would probably not exist any more, except on the backs of our quarters and as a graphic on Republican web sites promoting corporate pollution.
We've seen the American bald eagle fly, and we think that it is worth protecting. So does Representative Case, who voted NO in a courageous stand for the Endangered Species Act.The Climate Stewardship Act is the most significant American
legislation yet to address the threat of global climate change. The CSA proposes market-based methods of promoting clean alternatives to
America's current Industrial Age systems for transportation and energy. Under the CSA, emissions of greenhouse gases would be reduced over a
five year period back to the levels produced in the year 2000. Although the CSA offers only minor controls, it is an important first step in keeping the problem of preventing the emissions of gases
related to global climate change from growing worse than they already are. It is supported by environmental activists and strongly opposed by pollution industries and the Bush Administration.
The House of Representatives last voted on the CSA in March 2004, unfortunately failing to pass the bill. Fortunately, Rep. Wayne Gilchrest of Maryland has reintroduced the act in the 109th Congress as H.R. 759. For lending support to the CSA by cosponsoring H.R. 759, Rep. Case has taken an important progressive stand.By voting against the Hostettler Amendment to H.R. 2862, Rep. Case stood for the rule of law and the rights of minorities from government-funded religious proselytization in public spaces. Rep. Hostettler of Indiana and an unfortunate majority of the House of Representatives voted to keep a ruling of a federal court from being enforced. Why? Because a judge decided that a religious monument on the grounds of the Gibson county courthouse was an unconstitutional endorsement of one religion over others. These has apparently decided that any personally distasteful court ruling can be overturned, just because. That's not the rule of law. That's an arbitrary violation of the separation of powers. And, in this case, it allows pushy and vocal religious groups to shove their beliefs down everybody else's throats. That's not just wrong, it is downright unAmerican.
Although the Hostettler amendment unfortunately passed, Rep. Case had the courage to stand against it, and so deserves our thanks in this regard.
Any reasonable person who believes that trust in America's democratic institutions is important can see the value in being able to determine with assurance how a person has voted. It should be a matter of common sense, for instance, that when an electronic voting machine malfunctions and loses votes (as has happened in the past), a backup paper record of the actions of the machine would help elections officials set things right and make sure that every person's vote has been counted. Yet today, despite a history of malfunctioning electronic voting machines, there is no requirement for a backup paper trail. It's as easy as attaching a printer to a voting machine. Thanks to Congressperson Case for supporting H.R. 550, a bill which would require the establishment of such a paper trail.
Ed Case has formally supported H.R. 1157, which would keep government agents from riffling through your bookstore receipts and library records without your permission or knowledge. Unlike others, Rep. Case has shown true backbone, standing for privacy, for individual liberty, and against the Big Brother mentality that seems to be all the rage in Washington these days.
Rep. Case has taken the affirmative step of cosponsoring H.R. 2412, which would provide more information to the public about contacts between lobbyists and politicians, and which would slow down the revolving door of politics in which politicians move into cushy corporate jobs after they retire in exchange for favors. We commend Representative Case for displaying the ethical and moral courage to stand up to the forces of corruption and secrecy in American politics.
We may think we live in modern times, but the U.S. Constitution still does not guarantee that individual rights shall apply equally to men and women. Without such a constitutional guarantee, all it could take is a rogue judge or an emboldened conservative Congress to take women's rights away by a simple majority vote. On the other hand, this nation is still encumbered with unfair legal notions that, all other things being equal, give mothers custody advantages over fathers. The current state of unequal protection is unfair to both women and men, and devalues our common underlying humanity.
Ed Case has formally supported H.J. Res 37, which would amend the United States Constitution to simply state the following: "Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification." It's simple, it's obvious, and it's about time something was done to enshrine this principle in the Constitution for men and women alike. Thank you, Rep. Case, for pushing the too-long-lingering ERA forward.
According to scientists, the coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska is as close to an untouched wilderness in the United States as we can get, with a rich diversity of wildlife in an ecologically sound setting. The area's biological diversity prompted President Dwight D. Eisenhower to set aside the area in perpituity, to protect it for all generations to come. Some in the Congress want to forever destroy the pristine nature of this habitat for the sake of a few years' oil supply, rather than invest in alternatives that would allow us to maintain the Refuge for future generations. Thankfully, Representative Ed Case has formally supported H.R. 567, which acts to protect and preserve the Refuge from short-sighted development.
Progressive political actions that Rep. Case could have taken but unfortunately chose not to take:
Contact Rep Case by E-mail, Phone (at 202-225-4906), or Fax (at 202-225-4987) to ask why they have chosen not to take the progressive path in these matters.
- The Patriot Act is a betrayal of the great American tradition of liberty because it encourages the government to spy on the legal, personal activities of Americans who have not broken the law. The Bush Administration is using that power to grab information out of commercial and public databases and assemble them into a single giant computer database through which the private affairs of every American citizen can be tracked by government officials. Rep. Case failed to vote against the reauthorization of the Patriot Act, empowering the Bush administration to continue to dismantle American liberties and erect a Big Brother edifice in their place.
- Rep. Case has not yet cosponsored H.R. 40, which would acknowledge the injustices of slavery and racial discrimination and establish a commission to study them.
- Rep Case has not yet cosponsored H.R. 63, which would make Election Day a federal holiday to make it easier to get out and vote.
- Rep. Case has not yet cosponsored H.R. 952, which would put an end to the practice of "extraordinary rendition," in which Bush Administration officials send people into the custody of certain nations, knowing full well (some would say intending) that they will be tortured there. Extraordinary rendition is another stain on the moral clarity of the United States. It is a horrible irony that in a "War on Terror," the United States government would allow the use of terror as a tool. Why is Rep. Case unwilling to stand against American complicity in the use of torture?
- Ed Case has not yet cosponsored H.R. 1440, which would keep members of the Federal Communication Commission from using their appointed positions to censor cable, satellite or internet programs they consider to be indecent. These "narrowcast" programs are accessed only by those who specifically request them, so why should the government make it their business to keep people from seeing what they want to see? Why has Rep Case not yet lent support to this sensible, freedom-defending bill?
Regressive Conservative Score: 15A score of 15 means that Rep. Case has acted to support 15% of a slate of conservative, wrongheaded policies in the 109th Congress.
Regressive, destructive, and downright unAmerican actions Rep. Case has taken that contribute to a RCS of 15:
The Patriot Act is a betrayal of the great American tradition of liberty because it encourages the government to spy on the legal, personal activities of Americans who have not broken the law. The Bush Administration is using that power to grab information out of commercial and public databases and assemble them into a single giant computer database through which the private affairs of every American citizen can be tracked by government officials. Unfortunately for the Amercan tradition of liberty, the Patriot Act reauthorization passed, with Rep. Case casting a craven YES vote.
H.R. 1070 marks a determined, deliberate attempt by fundamentalist politicians to lay the groundwork for knocking down barriers between the powers of church and state once and for all. The bill is sneaky in its obfuscation but dastardly in its effect. Read, then re-read, then re-re-read the central text of H.R. 1070:
Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the Supreme Court shall not have jurisdiction to review, by appeal, writ of certiorari, or otherwise, any matter to the extent that relief is sought against an entity of Federal, State, or local government, or against an officer or agent of Federal, State, or local government (whether or not acting in official or personal capacity), concerning that entity's, officer's, or agent's acknowledgment of God as the sovereign source of law, liberty, or government.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the district courts shall not have jurisdiction of a matter if the Supreme Court does not have jurisdiction to review that matter by reason of section 1260 of this title.
What does all that highfalutin language mean?
1. Imagine that some Federal, State or Local government official uses the power of her or his office to shove her or his personal beliefs about God down citizens' throats. Alternatively, imagine that a federal body (say, the Congress) or a state body (say, a state legislature) or a local body (say, the school board) passes a policy that codifies one set of religious beliefs into law.
2. Imagine that you consider this act to be not only wrong but unconstitutional. What can you do about it?
3. Nothing. You can't bring the issue up in any district court. You can't bring it up before the Supreme Court. You have no place to go to challenge the policies of your government, except for the very same government body or official who engages in the odious behavior to begin with.
In short, H.R. 1070 sets the legal foundation by which the President, the Congress, the State Legislatures, Town Councils, School Boards and the Local Dogcatcher can do anything they want in the name of God without review. Does that frighten you? Well, what's even more frightening is that Ed Case seems to think this is a good idea.